top of page

Governor’s Oil Shutdown Agenda Could Cripple California’s Energy Supply

ExtractingFact.com published an article last week criticizing the governor for his California oil shutdown agenda. Make no mistake, Newsom is not saying California won’t continue using 1.8 million barrels of crude oil per day. He is simply saying he wants the state to become 100 percent dependent on foreign crude oil.


Newsom’s goal is to kill the oil producers of California. He signed an executive order that “tombstones” oil producers by 2045. The 5th largest economy on planet earth is purposefully becoming fully dependent on hostile foreign oil producers to supply every drop California needs.






“Even under the most aggressive scenario transition to ZEVs, millions of petroleum-fueled vehicles are anticipated to remain on California’s roads and highways beyond 2035 … Gasoline is likely to remain the leading transportation fuel for at least a decade.”


So then, what happens if California still demands lots of gasoline and other transportation fuels but has shut down its capacity to produce the oil needed for those fuels?


Herein lies a massive flaw in Newsom’s crusade to shut down in-state oil production: California may not have the infrastructure to meet gasoline demand with imported crude.


Californians should be alarmed. After all, Newsom is demanding a dramatic shift in the gasoline supply chain, but we may not have the necessary port capacity, coastal storage, pipelines, or refinery facilities to execute it.


Even the state’s carbon neutrality roadmap recognizes the infrastructure challenges related to a higher dependence on crude imports. The California Air Resources Board’s 2022 Scoping Plan states:


“Any increases in imported crude above historic levels would result in increased deliveries through the marine ports. This increased activity could require more infrastructure to store and move larger volumes of crude to the refineries in state.”


Will Newsom – so focused on production shutdowns – recognize this reality and rush his government to permit major new fossil fuel infrastructure to support his legacy of foreign oil dependence?


And do oil companies – longtime targets of Newsom’s ire – have any reason to invest in new assets for a state that is moving so aggressively to put them out of business?


The tension between Newsom’s blind shutdown aspirations and the hard infrastructure realities on the ground signals a stunning lack of foresight in California energy policies.


If continued, Newsom’s shutdown agenda could leave California with no way to process adequate amounts of crude to meet in-state gasoline demands – leading to more supply shocks and price spikes that Californians can’t afford.



bottom of page